Accéder au contenu principal

The mouse

 


I am having a hard time focusing on my practice at the moment. 

I am spreading my energy between touring, admin, fundings apps (always!), marketing, earning m o n e y. 

I realised often I feel as if I was in a competition. Who does better, who brings more audience, who sells more tickets, more likes, more interviews, more. And when I loose my confidence, when success is measured from the outside.. well, that's when I feel endangered. And I shrink inside myself and I disappear inside a hole. And I give away/up (my) space. 

This happens when I lose focus. 

When I forget the WHY. 

The transcendance of our art form, the essence of my work: the craft, the research on the matter dance, dance, the creation. 

I had a close look at my 'Creative DNA' (Twyla Tharp). And that is exactly what I forget when I transform into a mouse. That it is all about the creative act. 

At least.. for me. 



Commentaires

  1. Yes, I completely relate, and it can be exhausting! There is so much in the external world experience that pushes us to do more and to be more. Is it ever enough? The answer always returns as, 'no'. There will always be the next promotion post and the next grant to write. The next creation to manifests from our imaginings.
    Art, I believe is an external manifestation of an internal act, in this case, creativity and the making or deriving of something from scratch. It is so innate to us, so much a part of us as artists, that the world will take and consume with little thought to how much a part of us they take in the process.
    I love how you turn back to the 'Why' in your creativity, often the answer starts with the 'because' answer we gave as a child.
    'Why do you want to dance/ create child?'"
    "Because..."


    We share so much creatively with barely a thought to ourselves; we make it easy for them.

    RépondreSupprimer

Enregistrer un commentaire

Posts les plus consultés de ce blog

The liberating act of surrendering to not knowing

  I grew up in a very big family of Italian immigrants in the North East of France. Family reunions were loud, cheerful. We would sit at the table for hours, eating, singing. My grand father would play mandoline and sing the same songs over and over again. But the loudness. And you HAD to be louder, quicker, more alert than you relatives to survive in this group of people! I believe this shaped my learning style.  No time to think or to overthink. In a family who had to re learn a language, a culture, there was no time for taking the time. Action was their salvation, their pride. My mum and her 8 brothers and sisters would all have careers in jobs where their "hands" were needed. My dad and his 2 relatives, the same. Although there was a tendency for the imagination, the poetic (the mandoline played a role in that). My dad studied Fine Arts and my his brother is a guitarist. They both taught, drawing and music.  The least you would have to speak, the better. It amuses me ...

#task 3 - Module 2

This course is inclined toward qualitative research methods. Write about your thoughts on positivist and non-positivist approaches. How do you reconcile yourself to a non-positivist position? What experiences in your past inform how you feel about these two positions? Include your thoughts on embodiment and Cartesian dualist’s mind / body divide. Relate this to your own practice and your professional experiences.     These big words scare me.  Positivist approach; scientific and fact based.  Art experience/training is necessarily subjective.  I keep questioning what I do, its legitimacy, its impact, its necessity even. So my understanding  of it is constantly changing. And so is my practice. My approach to movement today is far from what it was 8 years ago. It is deeper and just-er. Like; I have dug and entered the world that I wanted to explore a little more.  I am uncovering it as I am digging.  I am creating it as I am digging.  There is s...

the dislocation and the marriage / mind+body

  I have been very intrigued about some of your approach and research on somatic practices.  Dieter, Ann, Cael, Matthew.  When I started reading one of the module 1 handbook, I could not start but feel a squash in my stomach: "On this course we are coming from a starting point of embodiment. Embodiment does not separate mind and body. A separation of mind and body which is called Dualism, links knowledge (thinking, understanding, and ideas) with the mind only, and links sensation (hunger, growth and pain) with the body only; the dualist mind / body separation leaves the body as something that carries the mind around but is not a site of knowing." See. I do get this. Totally. Of course.  But my experience with illness totally shredded/crushed/destroyed the relationship between my body and my mind. My body had betrayed me and my mind was the only 'thing' that was me. My body became for a very short period of time (probably a couple of month after my diagnosis) a thing ...