Accéder au contenu principal

#3 the (unquestionable?) question of the Art

 


I guess I got lost in translation. But I did use the word "Selfishness in the creative process" once. Maybe "self-centered-ness" might be more what it is. The act of looking at what you make through your eyes, with your guts, as opposed to through the constant feedback, and the "I would have" conversations I have stopped listening to for my sanity. I believe I am a sort of selfish maker. Not with my collaborator who I highly and genuinely care for. But for the people outside the studio. In that sense I agreed with Olga. The question of the Art being necessary though. mmhm. 

Then comes the sharing of the work. THE moment I love the most. 

Then, the work slips out of my hand, of myself and becomes everything and everyone's. 

In that sense, I believe there is not a less selfish act than sharing something you have sweat for. You have gathered the money, the team, you have the mad courage of making and sharing. From the cave of "selfishness/self-centered-ness", you are on stage, offering all you have and all you are because there is nothing more humbling nor necessary than ART. Performing art, installation, music, painting, photography, music, literature. Art is like another religion, something we created, crafted, that has rules, codes, something that gets you to go beyond yourself. Art connects you to the HUMANITY part of yourself. Art connects you to the ANIMALISTIC part of yourself. 

It tears you apart. It makes you feel complete. It makes you feel like you are more than just a living being on this planet, for such a short period of time. It makes you inhale and exhale life. 

Practice. Practice to me serves the work of art. All my being (at least at the moment) tends to the work of art. Practice, serves. 

But Art, just like Practice, heals, cures, saves, teaches, makes you feel, gets you to escape, opens your eyes and your soul. Art is like... a practice for the soul. 

°°°°°°°°°

I have been thinking about what we said about the wholeness of our practice. I strongly agree with this. I cannot separate the work of art/practice from the person. That's why I have never finished "Journey to the end of the night". Some things started to sound off and the man was a pure mysogynist. And a fascist. That sweated from his words. 

I am interested in instinct. I thought naively it was because of the research I had led throughout the years. The animal vs. the human. The weird creatures we are. The matter, that body, that comes to an end, and our mind, our noble mind... Chatting this morning I realized that instinct was so dear to me because mine saved me. 

I listened to my body years ago. I knew something was wrong and kept being told "you're young and healthy". I was young, that was true. But I wasn't healthy. My body and my mind broke apart, a clear dislocation: on one side, that body I had trained, trusted, sculpted, loved; on the other side: that mind I had fed, sharpened. One had failed me and I hated it. That matter, that thing I was caring around had nearly killed me and mortality had become an old friend. When I understand that "I" had created it, "I" had created a monster, an octopus. "I" had hijacked myself. 

Then I got pregnant. I miscarried. That body had failed me again. I discovered craniotomy-sacral therapy. I had magical experiences of feeling my body melting on the table, in the hands of my practicioner and in the air of the room. I had become one with nature. 

I had forgotten that « I » was nature. 

Instinct. 

I got pregnant again. 2018. Crazy nature. Trusting my body again. It has stoped creating death. It is able to create life after all. 

I got pregnant again. 2021. I have untamed myself, I have connected with my cavewoman. 

Instinct. 

°°°°°°°°°

2019. I make a piece about cancer. The Ephemeral life of an octopus. 
After that piece, a woman who had had breast cancer came to me and said "this made me proud of having hosted such creatures" (= the cells). 

So yes. The selfishness remains within the creative process. To me THIS is the power of Art. It transforms one's experience into something else. It changes your view on things. 

It heals the soul. 


Note to myself: I need to talk about my collaborators / learning from them / making work = excuses to learn something new from them. 


Commentaires

  1. This is so beautifully written and articulated Léa, there is so much clarity in how you talk about our animalness and it makes me so curious to see your work!! It seems grounded in such richness. It's just so nice to hear about the moments of transformation you're able to witness on both yourself and your audience - super powerful.

    RépondreSupprimer
  2. Wow, thank you Léa for sharing these parts of your journey so far. The conversation on zoom about our self centeredness as artistic creators really had me evaluate how I choreograph, perform, and teach, and how each of those holds a different space for connectiveness. I love the story about the Cancer piece and the response from a viewer- so powerful. Thank you for sharing, looking forward to learning more from you. x

    RépondreSupprimer
  3. Hi Lea. Thank you for sharing your perspective on self centeredness. However, you were not lost in translation. The term I used was selfishness. I guess in the context of creative process it was first used by Nietzsche.

    RépondreSupprimer
    Réponses
    1. Hi Olga - yes you did, and I responded that I do use that word a lot. I wrote about Selfishness in the creative process in a chapter of an essay last year. This word interests me a lot and that's why when you mentioned it, I clicked. I am referring to my use of it in the context of reflecting on my artistic practice. Thanks for the reference to Nietzsche! x

      Supprimer

Enregistrer un commentaire

Posts les plus consultés de ce blog

#task 3 - Module 2

This course is inclined toward qualitative research methods. Write about your thoughts on positivist and non-positivist approaches. How do you reconcile yourself to a non-positivist position? What experiences in your past inform how you feel about these two positions? Include your thoughts on embodiment and Cartesian dualist’s mind / body divide. Relate this to your own practice and your professional experiences.     These big words scare me.  Positivist approach; scientific and fact based.  Art experience/training is necessarily subjective.  I keep questioning what I do, its legitimacy, its impact, its necessity even. So my understanding  of it is constantly changing. And so is my practice. My approach to movement today is far from what it was 8 years ago. It is deeper and just-er. Like; I have dug and entered the world that I wanted to explore a little more.  I am uncovering it as I am digging.  I am creating it as I am digging.  There is s...

the dislocation and the marriage / mind+body

  I have been very intrigued about some of your approach and research on somatic practices.  Dieter, Ann, Cael, Matthew.  When I started reading one of the module 1 handbook, I could not start but feel a squash in my stomach: "On this course we are coming from a starting point of embodiment. Embodiment does not separate mind and body. A separation of mind and body which is called Dualism, links knowledge (thinking, understanding, and ideas) with the mind only, and links sensation (hunger, growth and pain) with the body only; the dualist mind / body separation leaves the body as something that carries the mind around but is not a site of knowing." See. I do get this. Totally. Of course.  But my experience with illness totally shredded/crushed/destroyed the relationship between my body and my mind. My body had betrayed me and my mind was the only 'thing' that was me. My body became for a very short period of time (probably a couple of month after my diagnosis) a thing ...

#task1 - Module 2

Alain Platel.   When I discovered his work, my whole world collapsed and crumbled, my belly, my soul got crashed. How on earth could this exist and how on earth had I missed this? 2007, back from a party very late at night, I turn on the tiny tv I used to have and watch ARTE. A woman is dancing, stumbling, ‘stuttering’, she is very skinny, uncomfortably skinny, it is uneasy yet intriguing, her movements seemed to speak the language of her tormented soul or at least, tormented body.  A dance that wasn’t just about the dance, a dance that seemed to go beyond the body, an embodiment of what’s beyond. Humanity. Its tragedy.  This is what I long for, Art that confronts.  I have always been curious and attracted by avant-gardistes, Dada, Fluxus.. Chris Burden, La Monte Young. Something in what they did seemed off but was essentially ‘just/right’ to me.  Once I had discovered the existence of Alain Platel’s work and whenever I could, I religiously attended eac...